Reference Auditor

Check every source before your examiner does.

You have written the footnotes and built the bibliography. The Reference Auditor goes through them one by one and answers the question that keeps you up the night before submission: is every reference real, correct, and actually saying what I claim it says?

Online submissions open shortly. You will send a chapter, an article, or a full thesis, and get a clear report back, not a rewrite.

Three checks on every reference

A reference can look perfect and still be wrong in three different ways. We test for all three.

Does it exist?

We confirm the source is real and traceable. This catches sources that were mis-remembered or mis-typed, and, increasingly, sources invented out of thin air by software that produces realistic-looking references for works that were never written.

Are the details correct?

Author, title, year, journal, volume, publisher, court, page span. We check the bibliographic details of each source against the record and flag anything that does not match, down to the small errors that examiners notice immediately.

Does it support your point?

This is the one most checks miss. We read the exact page or paragraph you pinpoint and confirm the source actually says what you have attributed to it, not something close, and not the opposite.

Where the evidence comes from

To check a reference, we have to find the real thing. We search the open web and the major academic databases, across every kind of authority your work relies on.

Case law

Judgments and law reports, verified down to the paragraph you pinpoint.

Legislation

Statutes, regulations and constitutional provisions, checked section by section.

Books and articles

Scholarly monographs, edited collections and peer-reviewed journal articles.

Grey literature

Reports, working papers, policy documents and theses, where you have relied on them.

Our checks draw on the open internet and trusted academic databases and indexes, including the following.

Google Scholar Google Books CrossRef Semantic Scholar Open law reports The open web

We show our working. For every reference, we capture a snapshot of the exact passage, quoted word for word, alongside the page or paragraph it sits on. You see the evidence behind each verdict rather than having to take our word for it.

What you get back

A clear, colour-coded report, delivered to your inbox as a Word document, that takes each reference in turn, gives it a verdict, and explains it in plain English.

References Audit: sample findings
Verified: Smith, The Law of Contract (3rd edn, 2019) 142
Source exists, all details correct, and page 142 supports the point as cited. Quoted passage included. Nothing to change.
Check: Mthembu v Letsela, pinpoint para 14
The case is real and correctly named, but paragraph 14 does not contain the principle you attribute to it. The relevant passage appears at paragraph 27, quoted in full, with a suggested correction.
Problem: "Khumalo (2021), SA Journal of Policy, p. 88"
No record of this article could be found under this author, title, or journal across the databases searched. This reference may need to be replaced or removed before submission.

Illustrative example. Your report covers every footnote, in-text citation and bibliography entry, with a quoted snapshot and a suggested fix for each issue.

How it works

Four steps. You stay in control of the final submission throughout.

1

Send your document

Upload your Word file (a chapter, a paper, or the whole thesis) and tell us your referencing style: OSCOLA, APA, Harvard, Chicago, SALJ, PELJ and others.

2

We check each reference

Every footnote, in-text citation and bibliography entry is verified, one by one, against the published scholarly and legal record.

3

We confirm the pinpoint

For each source, we find the exact page or paragraph you cite and check that it genuinely supports the claim you have made with it.

4

You receive your report

A colour-coded Word report lands in your inbox, every finding explained in plain English, with a quoted snapshot and a suggested fix wherever something needs attention.

Who it's for

  • Postgraduate students checking a thesis or dissertation before submission.
  • Researchers preparing a journal article for peer review.
  • Law students and academics with heavy footnotes and case pinpoints to get right.
  • Anyone who drafted quickly, or used software that can produce convincing but non-existent sources, and wants certainty before the work is seen.

What it doesn't do

  • It does not rewrite your work or change your argument. The Auditor is a diagnostic, and every decision stays with you.
  • It does not invent or substitute sources on your behalf. It tells you what is wrong and suggests a fix.
  • Need language and structure edited too? That is our separate editing service. Ask and we will combine the two.

Your documents are treated as strictly confidential and are never shared.

Submit with confidence

One flat fee per document. No subscription, and no per-page surprises. You will know exactly where every reference stands, with the evidence to back it, before anyone else reads your work.

Audit my references

Online submissions open shortly.

Which referencing service do I need?

Three services touch your references, and they do three different jobs. Find the line that sounds like you — you're on the Reference Auditor now.